MIBAC Program Participant Data & Analytics


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23	Nr of responses DC progress	302
33
34	Question1
35	Instructor was sensitive and responsive to the backgrounds and educational needs of those taking the program
36
37
38	Responses	Nr of responses	Share of responses
39	Below Average	1	0%	0
40	Average	25	8%	1
41	Above Average	92	30%	2
42	Excellent	184	61%
43
44
45	Average score (0-3)	2.52
46	Average response	Excellent
47
48
49
50
51
52
53	Question2
54	Instructor covered the topic in an understandable & organized manner
55
56
57	Responses	Nr of responses	Share of responses
58	Below Average	1	0%	0
59	Average	25	8%	1
60	Above Average	95	31%	2
61	Excellent	181	60%
62
63
64	Average score (0-3)	2.51
65	Average response	Excellent
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73	Question3
74	Information presented in the context of its practical value and relevance
75
76
77	Responses	Nr of responses	Share of responses
78	Below Average	0	0%	0
79	Average	25	8%	1
80	Above Average	94	31%	2
81	Excellent	183	61%
82
83
84	Average score (0-3)	2.52
85	Average response	Excellent
86
87
88
89
90
91
92	Question4
93	Please assess the instructor with a numeric value based on lecture abilities:
94
95
96	Responses	Nr of responses	Share of responses
97	Fair (60-69)	1	0%	0
98	Average (70-79)	17	6%	1
99	Good (80-89)	77	25%	2
100	Excellent (90-100)	207	69%	3
101
102
103	Average score (0-3)	2.62
104	Average response	Excellent (90-100)
105
106
107
108
109
110
111	Question5
112	Please assess the instructor with a numeric value based on knowledge:
113
114
115	Responses	Nr of responses	Share of responses
116	Fair (60-69)	0	0%	0
117	Average (70-79)	8	3%	1
118	Good (80-89)	46	15%	2
119	Excellent (90-100)	248	82%	3
120
121
122	Average score (0-3)	2.79
123	Average response	Excellent (90-100)
124
125
126
127
128
129
130	Question6
131	Please assess the instructor with a numeric value based on relevance to the discussion topic:
132
133
134	Responses	Nr of responses	Share of responses
135	Fair (60-69)	3	1%	0
136	Average (70-79)	8	3%	1
137	Good (80-89)	57	19%	2
138	Excellent (90-100)	234	77%	3
139
140
141	Average score (0-3)	2.73
142	Average response	Excellent (90-100)
143
144
145
146
147
148
149	Question	Average response
150	Question	Average response
151	Instructor was sensitive and responsive to the backgrounds and educational needs of those taking the program	Excellent				Please assess the instructor with a numeric value based on knowledge:
152	Instructor covered the topic in an understandable & organized manner	Excellent				Excellent (90-100)
153	Information presented in the context of its practical value and relevance	Excellent				Good (80-89)
154	Please assess the instructor with a numeric value based on lecture abilities:	Excellent (90-100)			77	Average (70-79)
155	Please assess the instructor with a numeric value based on knowledge:	Excellent (90-100)			46
156	Please assess the instructor with a numeric value based on relevance to the discussion topic:	Excellent (90-100)			57